The recent positive statement by RSS Chief disowning certain observations of an earlier Chief regarding Indian minorities is a woderful example of Indian democracy enabling reviews and increasing acceptability by dialog and discussions of various shades of opinions.
In 1947 when India became free, it chose democracy as it's form of government. It gave one person one vote. In its constitution it enshrined principles of equality, justice and fundamental rights in equal measure to all its citizens irrespective of their religion, cast or creed. At a later date the word "secular" was also added.
Soon this was to become a bone of contention between certain sections of the Indian society especially the rightists. Their stand was that British India was partitioned into India and Pakistan in 1947. The creation of Pakistan was specifically to provide a separate nation to the Muslim community who expressed that they would not be treated as equal citizens in a Hindu dominated undivided India.
This for many Indians, it followed that today's India was for Hindus just as Pakisran was for Muslims. However the reality was different. Pakistan chose to become a fundamentalist state by naming itself as the Islamic Republic of Pakistan while India chose to be known as Republic of India. Thus religion was not to be an instrument of State in India.
This was not acceptable to a significant section of the Indian Hindu society. However the presence of nearly 15-20% minorities could not be simply brushed aside. Thus many right wing groups sprang up some large and many small and from time to time kept the pot of Hindu domination burning
There is no doubt that India is predominantly a Hindu majority nation. Other than Nepal, India is the only Hindu majority nation in the world. Thus it's ethos and sentiments shall always continue to be essentially Hindu in nature. If India is democratic it is so because majority of Hindus are democratic in their outlook. However since last few years their has been growing emergence of right wing forces wanting the official domination of majority religion to be recognised. Some extreme groups even want the word "secular"to be dropped from the preamble of our Constitution.
However the recent statement by the Chief of RSS at a three day meeting in Delhi discarding chunks of an earlier chief Golwalkar's earlier thoughts is a very welcome gesture. The Chief was clarifying his statement that Muslims were not "unwanted" and Golwalkar's views they and other minorities were "internal enemies".
This change of heart should be seen as a victory for Indian democracy where the will and desire of the neutral majority prevails. This acceptance of religious minorties will hopefully reduce the gulf between RSS/BJP and them. This will enable reduction in religious polarization. While the minorities can breathe more freely the majority can feel more responsible towards them.
Sooner or later democracy helps in facilitating right decisions. Indian democracy gets strenghthened by such accomodating features.
The Indian marriage system has always made me angry. The extent of gender inequality makes me very sad..
Navjot Singh Sidhu is a man who courts the limelight and he had done precisely that by hugging the Pak army chief during the swearing ceremony of the swearing-in of the Pak cricketer Imran Khan which he attended as a special invitee..
Indian Signal Service was a part of the Indian Army Corps of Engineers (1777) at the beginning, then Lieutenant Colonel SH Powell separated it and Indian Signal Service was raised. eventually it became the Indian Signal Corps..
India is a secular state with the majority population being Hindu. Nobody can deny this and there should be no hesitance in accepting it that India despite of being a Hindu state is secular. Politicians play minority appeasement policy to keep the divide wide and keep gaining the political brownies. There should be no minority appeasement in a real secular state. That definitely defeats the real essence of secularism.reply 0